|
Position
Papers
|
06/08/08 |
|
Discussion
Archives
|
David Nollmeyer Position Paper The construction of MOEC is no more than a novel elaboration of a Defection Model based on Prisoner's Dilemma. Current Positive law statutes as RICO will adequately gain secure convictions. These statutes should be strengthened. MOEC is also designed as an artificial religion as Scientology. It is religion in disguise. It is irrationalist with provocateurs being first sent in to social wreck. The following excerpt is from Origin. An original book based on a briefing I was given over twenty years ago in June 1987.
The eternal law is the mind of the Ruler Supreme equating to Divine Government thus binding the living being to final salvation and judgment. The natural law is the law of nature proper, of Mother Nature as some have called her. This according to the theologian concludes that intelligence and consciousness are limited by contact with matter by man’s birth in nature. The gift of intelligence, reason, must be used to elevate oneself to an understanding of the eternal law. The demonstratable scientist does not accept this metaphysical position as this pertains to the eternal law. The scientist will accept only what is fully demonstratable. This is also an argumentive process of the natural reason which can be stated in equivalence to the natural law as has been done by other great masters as Aquinas. The positive law is the human law. It is the great constitutions of man, governments both theistic and secular, written and promulgated for all by the sovereign. The thinking being such, if there is a spiritual right, there is a natural right. If there is a natural right there needs be a law to protect it. This should be kept whole and conserved by the law and held cumulatatively. This is as the legal right of the commonwealth. These spiritual rights, these natural rights become the positive having been set forth in the great constitutions that have risen by will of God or man’s own. This morality, hence the giving up of some freedom by one individual to the many to preserve the freedom, rights that existed in the state of nature and spiritual creation, (theistic and metaphysical if the debate permits) is a right protected by a law, a series of laws as adequate in the positive constitutions. This was information was studied and heard by Man whom compiled such into Particular History and Justice. To be complete i one’s activity man needs a moral proposition to one’s mental and physical activity to its final end. As stated the three stated laws comprise the essence of the consequent laws. Man has historically claimed perfection in consciousness, intelligence, relative to one or all in the erecting of the state. This precludes the necessity of another model, one of constitutions which is predominately Aristotelian in its origin.
Kings have claimed descendency from God to rule, this within their own demonstration or the sanction of the priesthood. This is the rule of the best man. The aristocracy having laid a claim to rule by virtue of the qualification of having the best births, education, and so forth, the familiar histories of service, members inclusive of peerage, legislators, lawyers, doctors, owners of land, business, and the priesthood; this wealth excludes them from the temptation to abuse power. Such are the claims of the aristocracy to power. The democrat’s claim lies in freedom. As men seem to be spawned of a similar birthing, they are all equal. If man was equal at his birthing, then all men are equal. If man was equal at his birthing, he is equal in all things. If he is equal in the greatest thing, man’s freedom, than he shall be equal in all things similar. This democrats claim to know greater. The fact that the mind’s of many men are greater than the minds of a few or one man add to the claims the democrats make to rule. To begin earnestly in this argument is to order a will, to begin a mobilization. One may establish their claims to rule and choose the intellectual model practical. A moral claim to rule may be pure. If this is the case it is orthodox, usually a theistic argument but not necessarily true. This argument is basically deemed to be infallible in the strictest definition. Once revealed it is held to be true and not subject to revision. A moral claim to rule may be mixed. It may contain theistic as well as scientific arguments. It may be amendable. This claim contains a revisionist tendency. This lends a greater credence to revolution. In the particular case the latter was taken in regards to the former. Copyright by David Nollmeyer Higher Structural Levels of Cognition At this aperture we must introduce the Concept Of Higher Structural Levels of Cognition. This is similar to the childhood parable of The Blind Man and the Elephant. A System is understood completely by the level that has the greatest cognition and control over its subcomponents. A fugue has parts:
Here we can see comprehending the whole piece of the song is provides the greatest unity of cognition of the structure as a system. In jurisprudence a confession by the authorship of the origination of an illegal act is greatest. The criminal knows his own crime. Alienation
The Alienation of the Individual is an important perspective to comprehending many social systems models. I will consider such here mainly in the stance taking by a cell of Los Angeles Police Department, California, and myself. At a higher structural level I argue that Cambridge Law School of the United Kingdom has most likely designed this event. I will not attack such here because the chance of getting any sound legal opportunity is decreased. One facet of Totalitarianism is that such seeks to isolate the individual or collective incommunicado from the whole. This is artificial alienation or the feeling that one is not offered an equal opportunity, recognition, and dignity by the whole in one’s social setting. Here one has to consider the identity of LAPD. They are homosexual or bisexual police officers. There are perhaps twenty plus in the main cell and 160 in other cells of the department itself which is commandeered by Chief William Bratton at the present. A consideration to be deliberated on now is the Theory of Extinction. This states that a species will become extinct due to a static role in open texture. One could argue that the Dodo bird became extinct because it did not fly to a warmer location. It had wings and the intelligence to do so. This is a static role. The continuum of weather systems is open. Dinosaurs perhaps during a cataclysm may not of had the intelligence or the motility to escape a global freezing event. Here we have to examine the needs of human life. One needs four essential elements to sustain or survive:
One could argue the fourth as optional for the individual but essential for the continuation of species life. Here the next issue is the role of heterosexuality and homosexuality. I am going to argue bisexuality, transgender, and other issues herein taken as LGBT. This is current as of this writing and it too is in open texture and will most likely evolve. The rule of law is of utmost importance. Is the cosmos and the world of our experience being upheld by laws? Do we have to obey to such laws? Can humans amend these laws? In short LAPD is committing a fallacy of ad baculum, rule of force, and loving one’s self by accident. The military and police are agents of social control. The police are a para-military designed structure. In advanced Homeland Security Systems the Military is used to defend the borders of the state and the citizens from attack. Military and policing are separate but are converging. In many simple systems the police are curtained heightened threats may be converted into the military. Hence, they return to their stations and pick up heavy armor and their command structures may or may not be changed. The main legal document of the United States is the United States Constitution. Bill of Rights
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.htmlLAPD has attempted to negate the concept of inherent rights for the individual and instead become fatalistic. This places the citizenry as dependent. Such are gradually marginalized or killed of at the discretion of the security force or military, police, and agents. I seek only to remedy my situation through civil or criminal proceeding through laws and the courts not by defection to de facto members. Prisoner's Dilemma In MOEC the main concept is to substitute three levels of laws to the authorship and agents. This would be Cambridge Law School (which is based on those claiming to be LAPD) and LAPD in this country. Here the concepts of positive law are mainly being discerned fro now. In this instance under racketeered influence behaviors individuals who are natural persons living in a state as per se Americans in the United States are given choices or intimidated into accepting the opportunities that are presented by LAPD. This will affects one's status as a citizen or criminal. LAPD will use either legal or de facto tactics to reconcile while remaining impugn from prosecution. In this sense the standing sovereignity in the state is deteriorated. The racketeering of drugs is a favorite target for this time period. Many points in this article may be difficult to understand without a background in the elementary concepts of Will two prisoners cooperate to minimize total loss of liberty or will one of them, trusting the other to cooperate, betray him so as to go free? In game theory, the prisoner's dilemma is a type of non-zero-sum game in which two players can "cooperate" with or "defect" (i.e. betray) the other player. In this game, as in all game theory, the only concern of each individual player ("prisoner") is maximizing his/her own payoff, without any concern for the other player's payoff. In the classic form of this game, cooperating is strictly dominated by defecting, so that the only possible equilibrium for the game is for all players to defect. In simpler terms, no matter what the other player does, one player will always gain a greater payoff by playing defect. Since in any situation playing defect is more beneficial than cooperating, all rational players will play defect.The unique equilibrium for this game is a Pareto-suboptimal solution—that is, rational choice leads the two players to both play defect even though each player's individual reward would be greater if they both played cooperate. In equilibrium, each prisoner chooses to defect even though both would be better off by cooperating, hence the dilemma.In the iterated prisoner's dilemma the game is played repeatedly. Thus each player has an opportunity to "punish" the other player for previous non-cooperative play. Cooperation may then arise as an equilibrium outcome. The incentive to defect is overcome by the threat of punishment, leading to the possibility of a cooperative outcome. If the game result is infinitely repeated, cooperation may be a Nash equilibrium although both players defecting always remains an equilibrium.The classical prisoner's dilemma The Prisoner's dilemma was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence payoffs and gave it the "Prisoner's Dilemma" name (Poundstone, 1992).The classical prisoner's dilemma (PD) is as follows: Two suspects, A and B, are arrested by the police. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal: if one testifies for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent, the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both stay silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a two-year sentence. Each prisoner must make the choice of whether to betray the other or to remain silent. However, neither prisoner knows for sure what choice the other prisoner will make. So this dilemma poses the question: How should the prisoners act? The dilemma can be summarized thus:
The dilemma arises when one assumes that both prisoners only care about minimizing their own jail terms. Each prisoner has two options: to cooperate with his accomplice and stay quiet, or to defect from their implied pact and betray his accomplice in return for a lighter sentence. The outcome of each choice depends on the choice of the accomplice, but each prisoner must choose without knowing what his accomplice has chosen to do. Let's assume the protagonist prisoner is working out his best move. If his partner stays quiet, his best move is to betray as he then walks free instead of receiving the minor sentence. If his partner betrays, his best move is still to betray, as by doing it he receives a relatively lesser sentence than staying silent. At the same time, the other prisoner's thinking would also have arrived at the same conclusion and would therefore also betray. If reasoned from the perspective of the optimal outcome for the group (of two prisoners), the correct choice would be for both prisoners to cooperate with each other (both staying silent), as this would reduce the total jail time served by the group to one year total. Any other decision would be worse for the two prisoners considered together. When the prisoners both betray each other, each prisoner achieves a worse outcome than if they had cooperated. This demonstrates very elegantly that in a non-zero sum game a Pareto optimum and the Nash Equilibrium can be opposite. In other words, that a non-zero sum game may not have a solution that is both optimal and stable; a Pareto optimum can be unstable and the Nash equilibrium can be sub-optimal.Alternately, the "Stay Silent" and "Betray" strategies may be known as "don't confess" and "confess", or the more standard "cooperate" and "defect", respectively. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemmaThe Use of Chemical Agents The use of chemical agents is designed to intimidate and then criminalize resorting in blackmail and extortion. The process is applied usually to a person accused of a crime. Eventually all those persons attempting to aid this person are criminalized by the impugn movers which are usually at least paramilitary. Here we will use a de facto police agency and the Bill of Rights. A ring leader of a militant cell will attach a spray of chemicals, hydrochloric acid to the First Amendment which is the Key Amendment. This is an intent. He then follows a pattern I-5-4-6-8-2-3-7-9. A suspect who is accused of a crime attempts to seek legal recourse through the Bill Of Rights. As soon as he does a policeman drives around his home with a mixture of acid in his car. This will create SCORCHED EARTH. The policeman is guilty. As the person begins to seek lawyers. The acid mixture is sprayed in ventilation systems of his house and neighbors as well as the lawyers and the court buildings. Eventual a pattern is fulfilled where all four essential elements to sustain or survive are sprayed:
Instead of the Rule of Law defection to the rogue cell of policeman develops. In analysis one's civil rights are freedoms placed over one's natural existence by a legislator. The defection and chemical assault are also placed over one by a third actor. This tactic is also use on three forms of law:
This will create a police state over the interpretation of these three laws. A very sinister variant of this tactic is in use. It is the attachment of a crime to another crime. This creates a double crime against standing positive law. The chemical agent is applied to an illegal event as marijuana. If one has marijuana for sale the police will spray a portion and one has to sell it. If the dealer does not he will get arrested. The crime keeps one free, hence the chemical spray. One has rights and this is the basis for justice. Here the spray is attached to other objects. I know for a fact that libertarian objects as gambling and prostitution are targeted. The end result is that all economics turns into a system of racketeering. http://powereality.org/rico.htmMOEC ANALYSIS The following models are alleged to be the design of Cambridge Law School members. They are the authorship and the higher structural movers. Organizing a conspiracy in this manner is also a part of the systems defense mechanism. In a positive law court it would be easier to gain a dismissal due to fanciful and frivolous claims. Defection will begin from this level. It is likely that the authorship is dead. They are alleged to have been alive around the 1930s to near 1950s. Persons would be loyal to their work as if such were a constituion.
The Artificial Virus As states MOEC is a defection model that also has been designed as a religion. This begins as a cell that encompasses the experiment space of the defection model here are the basic subcomponents. The design at hand demonstrates the amount of time the authorship had in developing the conspiracy. What is odd is that such is designed as an artificial man but this cell is considered a neuron. There is no direct relationship with biology. I will have to explain the cell slowly over time. It would take a good twenty pages to do so in detail. The police implementing the entrapment are the Totalitarian Police System (TPSys). The end state or equilibrium where all will reside is the Totalitarian Police State (TPS). This is a WRECKING MODEL. Varna Asrama is an Ideal Social System based on the Vedas. Control is the cell wall and suprasystem all the other subcomponents can operate on one another to achieve transformations the mover wish to retain control.
What one has at hand is an attack on humans and nation states with the Vedas as a foil. An input of the system is a Holon. One can follow a Holon as the subcomponents of the system transform the Holon. An example can be the passing of a letter into a mail box and have it processed to the receiver. From this position of an exploded view we can deduce that the model was conceived in a table with rows or columns. Generally a Holon, Such may be a person, I will use my self as example when entrapped by TPSys would enter Particular History and Justice then receive elements of the entrapment from Parameters. One would then be in Maze. After interacting with the police he would develop Consciousness this maybe + or -. This is usually marginalization. One is most likely only in Rationality. One will develop a repertoire to survive which is Behaviorism. if unsuccessful one is dead and has been Atomized. If pure one can develop an Ideal States as Varna Asrama. One can also examine the develop vertically in a column. Maze - Rationality - Atomization and Consciousness - Rationality - Varna Asrama. Any religion or faith may be used. The Vedas are my faith and this would have been located in PHJ and applied. Here we come to an understanding that there is evidence that Cambridge Law School is behind the authorship and is the Origin. Trinity School is the Department of Theology and Philosophy for Cambridge It appears a deep knowledge of Greek philosophy and tyranny helped develop the model. Cambridge Law School would have been the final authority. The Ghost in the Machine and Holons 1-10 The Ghost in the Machine describes a debate acted out between the Philosophy and Law Department of Cambridge University. Holons 1-10 are a flow chart or schematic of a third party hostaging model that is a reduction of MOEC. It is no more than what a relay is in Law enforcement. The Ghost in the Machine is debate encompassing Absolute versus Relative Morality. The intent was to design a culture. The argument of whether there is God and one's individual and collective relationship to such. Epistemology was most likely a model. Hence food, clothing, shelter, and reproduction would follow. The most important facet of this debate is the argument of having women and homosexuals in the military. This is an old classical political philosophy argument. The discussion will involve extortion and blackmail. In this regards alcohol, drug use, as well as prostitution are brought up. Hence should a top level security clearance be given to a LGBT member. What is the consideration for past drug users? Should a person with extra-marital affairs be given clearance. It appears that the Philosophy department (Absolute Morality) defeated the Law School (Relative Morality). The power is the Law School under Prisoners Dilemma. What will emerge is an analogy to the Cult of Apollo versus the Cult of Dionysus. Apollo is the antecedent for conservative western philosophy. Dionysus is the antecedent for liberal philosophy. In reality it appears that Dionysus is free for a thousand years until Apollo captures him and binds him. In the meantime the world is lead into a Bacchanal - In Pursuit of Dionysus. Dionysus Free In reduction Nuclear Blackmail will be achieved. At this point in history non-military grade chemical warfare is historically proven in blackmailing the United States President. The following presidents have been extorted and blackmailed.
Holons 1-10 Holons 1-10 are one of the first clear models that are discernable in the manner of a flow chart or of the diagrams that are discernable in information theory. The Holons reflect a lottery, relay, what have you with a third party. In degree Number 4 takes a stone and threatens two. Number 3 is told he or she will be stoned unless Number 2 is operated on. Eventually Number 3 agrees. The two approach number and intimidate Number 2 with the same proposition. The target is number 1. Here we have Number 3 stating that he must operate on Number otherwise Number 4 will stone him. Number 2 states that he must operate on number one otherwise Numbers 3 and 4 will stone him. Number 1 is the victim. The point at this juncture is to have him attempt to retaliate against Number 4. This would only justify Number 4 organizing the entire event. This explanation is quite simplistic. Generally speaking Numbers 2, 3, and 4 are argued as guilty. I have already copyrighted the Holons up number seven. I have struggled over this for over seven years since 2000. It was disclosed that there were 9 or 10 Holons. The number 9 is used in relation novenas or the number of days that Jesus' followers waited outside of Jerusalem before entering. These prayers in modern times are usually seen in the classified ads of papers. They are popular with Catholics from Latin America. It is clear now that this is a trap. Most likely one would do is script one's own homicide. Number 1 cannot break any laws, hence pick up a stone illegally. He may only use self defense. Here we see an analogy to Christianity where Jesus Christ bears his cross. Jesus does does not have the numerical followers to defeat the Romans without acting as a God. He does the will of his Father and accepts his duty. In the original copyrighted version Holon II is Holon I. This is the main model. Holon V-VII may be variants of ideas (faith and material) and the use chemicals to hostage and punish. Homini homo lupus
At this time I will not develop the other Holons. Holon 9 is supposed to be neo - Superstructure. In Leninist Superstructure religion is argued as a structure. This appears to be a variant of Liberation Theory that has been attempted by theologians in South America during the Sandinista - Shining Path era. Holon 10 may be one's own righteous consolidation hence the end of Prisoners Dilemma. Pontius Pilate Paradigm The next important pattern is the Pontius Pilate Paradigm. This model is based on the work of Caiphus, the high priest of the Sanhedrin. Pontius Pilate was the Roman Procurator whom Jesus was brought before. Caiphus wanted to eliminate both Jesus Christ and Pontius Pilate. Jesus is entrapped with double bind arguments that he always took the bull by the horns and won. Jesus claimed that he could raise the Temple in three days. He was then considered a schismatic or apostate and brought before Pilate. Pilate announced that he had found Jesus innocent of the charge. He proclaims ecce homo - Behold the man! The crowd wishes for Jesus to be executed. Pilate asks the crowd on whether he should free Jesus. They respond with chants to crucify him. Pilate ritually washes his hand in the bowl. This is the most famous example of the fallacy ad populum. In degree the Holon will be used to shield a non-command level officers to entrap the Sovereign or Head of State. The Mockingbird Defense The Mockingbird Defense is a model to designate the two authorities in MOEC. This is would be the two lead lawyers in Cambridge Law School that were the command authorities. This would be the head of the department and an associate. It is possible that the second was at times a Scotland Yard officer. They are identified as Man or The Hand, the leader, and the second is called the Little One. In defection in Prisoner's Dilemma these two persons may be considered the sovereign and subject. In degree by using the United States Constitution we may analyze how attachment of a de facto event as a crime against the law will destabilize the law until it collapses save a remedy. These two persons have re-enacted an scenario were The Hand questions The Little One as "Will you betray the United States?" The Little one responds in the affirmative. A concept of the Social Contract states the rights should be enumerated prior to a crime so that a citizen would no what he or she is permitted to think and do with the protection of the state and the consequences occurred. The sovereign is the head of state and can only be represented by itself and no other. Here the major conspiracy of MOEC was alleged to have been handed off from Scotland Yard to Los Angeles Police Department in the 1930s. This would appear as: Holon III - Prisoner's Dilemma with Two Hostages as a Shields - Here this pattern is repeated but at a level where two police officers appear as Number 3 with their wives as hostages. So there will be a number 2 on the left and right with two Number 3 who are police man. This is used to induce them to continue the relay or circular folly. The Hand is Number 4. The Little One is Number 3. Scotland Yard is 2. LAPD is the other number 2. I or a citizen am Number 1. MOEC is an illicit conspiracy that is essentially reverse social engineering. All United States laws proceed from the Constitution. Hence MOEC is attempting to transfer loyalty from the United States government and Constitution to itself. This is inclusive of the authorship. This The Hand and The Little One. Hence to defect to MOEC means to have a degree of allegiance to these two, especially The Hand. If you attack any part of MOEC by any means you are a threat to The Hand. My personal rights are guaranteed by The Bill of Rights. All my positive rights are retained as long as there is a United States. I would argue The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also protects me. (Natural rights are also possible as are spiritual. For this time we shall stick to positive or rights that are pursuable in a court.) Hence under escalation as what has occurred MOEC is going to postulate that I remain alive or protected by MOEC itself as it displaces the United States. One must remember that TPSys is the process of the Totalitarian Police and TPS is the equilibrium or the Totalitarian Police State achieved. To develop defection MOEC will attempt to give one deal or gift to every person alive. There are 6 billion persons living now. I have been told that there are 144,000 targets all over the world and I am the main or Ultimate Target. This is used to substitute substantitive rights. What will occur is in reduction is that Cambridge Law School and Scotland Yard are Number 1. The Delaware State Police and Baltimore Police Department are Number 2. The Baltimore Studio or The Studio are Number 3. In degree the remaining population are Number 4 with myself. In degree under defection all the people, I would say upwards of 90% are playing defection. This is sub-optimal and a very low Nash equilibrium that is not sustainable. If defection is to the rule of law and citizenship than I and the government would be stable. The fallacy here is that by gathering CITIZENS TO DEFECT SUCH BECOME INFORMANTS. MOEC is no more than a Purge of Informants. I have attempted to prosecute MOEC in Court. One may consult this site: http://powereality.org/nollmeyer.htmHolon IV - Invertaebration with Number I attempting to challenge Number 4. The invertaebration of Holon 1 for simplicity was hope to be obtained. I believe and or attempted to create Holon 10. This is no more than using only non-violent legal means to prosecute MOEC and its agents. Hence we arrive at the artistic tyranny or the use of the Name Mockingbird Defense. By authoring the illegal defection as electronic surveillance, chemical assaults, and attacks by the population, The Hand and The Little One have to place themselves in my position. Citizenship is imposed over one by the legislature and signed into law by the head of state. If LAPD or anyone else attack me they are also attacking The Hand and The Little One. The Hand is analogy to several events historically, God and the the unseen hand in The Wealth On Nations are two. Man can represent Mankind as Adam and Eve from the Christian Bible. The Little One represent Native Indigenous Peoples of the world. This is due to the avenging nature of MOEC. There is a foil of rectifying past abuse to this group. I usually end up writing near American Indian peoples (Paiute 6-30-07). It is absurd to argue that scorched could aid anyone. I have sent a twenty page version of The Virus to several federal courts. This was supposed to be my year 2000 contribution. MOEC has attempted to marginalize my opportunities essentially by destroying the environment and gaining defection by corrupting a willing population After twenty years of survival we are existing the subcomponent Radanatha since 2-13-07. The closing of the event as of a trichotomy has occurred. We are in the Third Act or stage now. So in degree my rights are retained but my environment is contaminated. One of the mission goals of MOEC is Gay Rights of which it and its agents are the worst thing to occur for this social movement. I am a lifelong heterosexual and am presenting such as part of a baseline for sustainable culture.
|